Article 15 Procedures - DEPRECATED: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Commanding Officer's Non-Judicial Punishment (Article 15)= | =Commanding Officer's Non-Judicial Punishment (Article 15)= | ||
Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) allows a Commanding Officer to decide the innocence or guilt of an alleged offender and administer Non-Judicial Punishment (NJP) to the offender if necessary for offenses that | Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) allows a Commanding Officer to decide the innocence or guilt of an alleged offender and administer Non-Judicial Punishment (NJP) to the offender if necessary for offenses that not serious enough to warrant a Court Martial but exceed the purpose of a Negative Counseling Statement. These NJP are limited to specific punishments in line with the seriousness of the offense. | ||
==Definitions== | |||
*Convening Authority: Any officer at Company level or higher given the responsibility of investigating the alleged offence and making the recommendation on whether to convene an Article 15 or not. | |||
*Presiding Authority: The officer at Company level or higher who will conduct the Article 15 hearing, decide on the guilt or innocence of the accused and administer punishment. Usually the Company or Battalion Commander. | |||
==Limitations on Punishments== | ==Limitations on Punishments== | ||
Line 17: | Line 21: | ||
==Convening an Article 15 Proceeding== | ==Convening an Article 15 Proceeding== | ||
An officer at the level of Platoon Leader or higher may refer an incident to their next higher in the Chain-of-Command for an Article 15. | |||
===Investigation=== | ===Investigation=== | ||
An officer | An officer (the 'Convening Authority'), usually the XO at the Company Staff level or higher must conduct an investigation before deciding to convene an Article 15 Proceeding. The investigation should ensure: | ||
*The offense is not serious enough to exceed the limitations on punishments required for an Article 15. | *The offense is not serious enough to exceed the limitations on punishments required for an Article 15. | ||
*The | *The accused, accuser and any witnesses are interviewed. | ||
===Notification=== | |||
Upon receiving the referral, the Convening Authority will notify the following: | |||
*The Chief Judge Advocate General: Identifying the accused and apprising them of the circumstances and nature of the offense. | |||
*The Accused: The accused will be notified in writing via Private Message (PM) on the forums of the following: | |||
**The nature of the charge(s) against them. | |||
**Arrangements to meet for a preliminary interview, the point of which is to hear the accused's version of events. | |||
**Their right to have a member of the Judge Advocate General Department present as an adviser at all interviews and the hearing. | |||
**A clear explanation of the Article 15 process. |
Revision as of 00:28, 7 August 2018
Commanding Officer's Non-Judicial Punishment (Article 15)
Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) allows a Commanding Officer to decide the innocence or guilt of an alleged offender and administer Non-Judicial Punishment (NJP) to the offender if necessary for offenses that not serious enough to warrant a Court Martial but exceed the purpose of a Negative Counseling Statement. These NJP are limited to specific punishments in line with the seriousness of the offense.
Definitions
- Convening Authority: Any officer at Company level or higher given the responsibility of investigating the alleged offence and making the recommendation on whether to convene an Article 15 or not.
- Presiding Authority: The officer at Company level or higher who will conduct the Article 15 hearing, decide on the guilt or innocence of the accused and administer punishment. Usually the Company or Battalion Commander.
Limitations on Punishments
The following are the only punishments allowed under an Article 15 proceeding:
- Officers Accused of Misconduct:
- Maximum penalty of 30 days suspension from the Regiment.
- No favorable action for 30 days.
- Notation on their Milpacs record.
- Enlisted Members Accused of Misconduct:
- Maximum penalty of 30 days suspension from the Regiment.
- Reduction in rank by one grade for Non-Commissioned Officers.
- Reduction in rank by one or more grades for regular enlisted members.
- No favorable action for 30 days.
- Notation on their Milpacs record.
Convening an Article 15 Proceeding
An officer at the level of Platoon Leader or higher may refer an incident to their next higher in the Chain-of-Command for an Article 15.
Investigation
An officer (the 'Convening Authority'), usually the XO at the Company Staff level or higher must conduct an investigation before deciding to convene an Article 15 Proceeding. The investigation should ensure:
- The offense is not serious enough to exceed the limitations on punishments required for an Article 15.
- The accused, accuser and any witnesses are interviewed.
Notification
Upon receiving the referral, the Convening Authority will notify the following:
- The Chief Judge Advocate General: Identifying the accused and apprising them of the circumstances and nature of the offense.
- The Accused: The accused will be notified in writing via Private Message (PM) on the forums of the following:
- The nature of the charge(s) against them.
- Arrangements to meet for a preliminary interview, the point of which is to hear the accused's version of events.
- Their right to have a member of the Judge Advocate General Department present as an adviser at all interviews and the hearing.
- A clear explanation of the Article 15 process.