Article 15 Procedures - DEPRECATED: Difference between revisions
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
The following are the punishments allowed under an Article 15 proceeding: | The following are the punishments allowed under an Article 15 proceeding: | ||
#Officers Accused of Misconduct: | #Officers Accused of Misconduct: | ||
*# | #*Maximum penalty of 180 days no favorable action. | ||
#* | |||
==Convening an Article 15 Proceeding== | ==Convening an Article 15 Proceeding== |
Revision as of 18:24, 6 August 2018
COMMANDING OFFICER'S NON-JUDICIAL PUNISHMENT (ARTICLE 15)
Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) allows a Commanding Officer to decide the innocence or guilt of an alleged offender and administer Non-Judicial Punishment (NJP) to the offender if necessary for offenses that are minor and consequently do not require a Court Martial. These NJP are limited to specific punishments in line with the seriousness of the offense.
Limitations on Punishments
The following are the punishments allowed under an Article 15 proceeding:
- Officers Accused of Misconduct:
- Maximum penalty of 180 days no favorable action.
Convening an Article 15 Proceeding
An officer at the level of Platoon Leader or higher may refer an incident to their next higher in the Chain-of-Command for investigation. An officer (usually the XO) at the Company Staff level or higher must conduct an investigation before deciding to convene an Article 15 Proceeding. The investigation should ensure:
- The offense is not serious enough to exceed the limitations on punishments required for an Article 15.
- The alleged offender, accuser and any witnesses are interviewed and that brief, written summaries of the interviews are prepared.
- The investigating officer (Convening Authority) then decides whether an Article 15 should be convened.